New Efforts:
Blue Parabola, LLC
PHP'ers:
Ben Ramsey
Brandon Savage
Cal Evans
Chris Shiflett
Eli White
Elizabeth Naramore
Joe LeBlanc
Justin Thorp
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Rasmus Lerdorf
Tony Bibbs
Zend Blogs
Zend DevZone
DC Social Media:
Aaron Brazell
Jessie X
Ken Yeung
New Media Jim
Shashi B
Social Times
Technologists:
Jimmy Gardner
O'Reilly Radar
Scott Berkun
Steve McConnell
Business/mISV:
Bob Walsh
Eric Sink
Gavin Bowman
Guy Kawasaki
Joel Spolsky
Micah Baldwin
Paul Graham
Planet mISV
Past Projects:
CodeSnipers
HOBY
Judicial Watch
mobile Fox Affiliates
mobile FoxNews.com
MyDearJohnLetter
NRTW
techRepublican
Great Tools I use:
BaseCamp
Drupal
getClicky
Highrise
phpUnit
Qcodo
Subversion
web2Project
Zend Framework
This is not the home of dotProject. It is the home of CaseySoftware, LLC. Any dotProject support questions should be referred to their support forums.
Any and all discussion and information in this post should be taken as professional commentary and analysis for a US-based audience, not legal advice. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice. When in doubt, talk to an attorney. When not in doubt, talk to an attorney. Either way, do some research first and have intelligent questions for them. It will save you time, money, and stress.
Every so often in my professional life, I get a Non-compete Agreement across my desk. The vast majority of them are along the lines of "you can't solicit our customers, we can't solicit yours for N months/years". A few are along the lines of "any inside information learned from us cannot be used for anything other than what we authorize".
I find both of these to be reasonable and normally sign them with little - if any - hesitancy.
Then there's another kind of clause... the "you can't support yourself anymore!" clause.
These are just plain nasty. They are no longer about protecting the sensitive information (procedures, customer lists, etc) of the organization, they become a bit more aggressive and go after one's livelihood. They are more focused on limiting what a person (employee, contractor, whatever) can do than just protecting information. This opens a pretty large window for abuse.
From a professional perspective, you should never sign any of these unless you are completely confident and comfortable living bound by these terms. If you sign one of these with their assurance that "this is standard, we never enforce it"... you're taking a huge risk. You're opening yourself up to a huge potential liability that they could sue you at any time, for any reason, or just because they're bored.
The Non-compete that was delivered to me described that I would be banned from providing any services similar to what this organization provides. Their current offerings include: "Web Development", "Blog Design", "Search Engine Optimization", and a variety of related services that CaseySoftware has been providing since 2004 and that I personally have provided since 2000.
If you're interested in hearing a bit more on this discussion, I'll be speaking at Social Matchbox 4 on Non-Completes. If you live in Virgina, California, or Massachusetts, the courts and legal system take a special perspective on Non-competes...
Non-Competes in Virginia
Noncompete contracts are governed by state law and each state looks at the issue from a differing perspectives. My law firm represents employees fighting unfair noncompetes and we write about these issues on our blog:
http://virginianoncompete.blogspot.com/
T. Daniel Frith, III
Frith Law Firm, PC
303 Washington Avenue, SW
Roanoke, VA 24016
Phone: 540.985.0098
Fax: 540.985.9198
Toll-free: 866.985.0098
dfrith@frithlawfirm.com
Looking forward to the
Looking forward to the hearing your thoughts on this subject. I blogged about this recently here:
http://jobmatchbox.com/wordpress/index.php?s=non-compete
Thanks
Thanks for the followup and response. I would disagree with you on one point though...
As soon as you start letting your side work extend into your normal business day - taking calls, responding to emails, etc - you're taking a huge risk. Even if you're "on your lunch hour", you're on a company-sanctioned break period, so a lawyer could claim that you're still "on their clock".
Because here's the worst thing... it doesn't need to be a valid claim to be effective, it just has to enough interest to convince a lawyer to give you a hard time. If there are big dollars involved, this isn't hard.
A valid claim can shut you down. An invalid claim can tie you up in meetings, court, discovery, and costs for your own attorney. Even if they don't win, you can still lose.
Post new comment