Date: 17 November, 2005 - 08:20
Bright and early this morning, I opened my "Daily" bookmarks in Firefox and started catching up on everything. I read my Dilbert, checked the logs for this site, and published Caleb's latest article on CodeSnipers. And then I checked in on O'Reilly and noticed something... here, I'll describe it with images instead of words (click for larger size):

Notice anything odd there? Is there perhaps something obstructing the view of the page I actually came to visit? Is there something preventing me from being able to move on with what I was doing and generally causing me to say "what the...?"?
Yes, if you accidentally move the mouse over the banner ad, the huge window below opens and Microsoft asks us to "discover the difference". Microsoft - masters of the web experience which they are - hijacks my experience in order to sell their products.
Dear Bill, I know you're a regular reader here, so let me give you a tip. There is a reason why Google has swallowed the ad space whole. They "get it" with their ads and don't intrude into our lives and destroy the user experience. That's why most blogs have Adsense or something similar.
Funny note, they talk about "enhanced visualizations" when you move over the whiteboard. Microsoft, you've gotten one thing right, when I want "enhanced visualizations", the first place I go is to the whiteboard. But I digress...
Is this this perhaps a case of O'Reilly - a company's from which I own 20+ books purchased over the past 6 years - shilling for Microsoft? Or is it perhaps that some Account Manager at O'Reilly did a poor job of vetting ads?
I for one am stunned by O'Reilly's disregard - either through malice or negligence - for their readership. From Microsoft, I'm not all that surprised.










They have a double page
They have a double page advertisement in the most recent issue of C/C++ Users Journal. The first page shows a picture much like on the O'Reilly site. The picture on the second page contains a lot of more or less subtle changes - way more than the picture on the O'Reilly site reveals. The print ad is actually kind of fun (different books on the shelf, the cactus is blooming, etc. etc.). Not only is the online ad invasive, it's also pretty boring.
Well, they found me.
Well, I got linked from O'Reilly blogs, so maybe some O'Reilly thugs* will come get me. I've just updated my address on file since I moved last month. Please feel free to come by.
* Actually, if Tim, Nat, Marc, or any of those other guys show up at my door, I'll be happy to buy a round or two of beer to toast their work... especially since I didn't get to hear Marc at Startup School last month. Stupid Amtrak.
Broken feed?
I could not see the image in the RSS feed, as you're not using an absolute path. Not sure if my aggregator is broken, or if Drupal is, just thought I'd mention it...
Usually the Ad Server
We have a pretty strict set of advertising guidelines, but sometimes a remote ad server (not under our control) serves the wrong type of ad.
It can be tricky dealing with agencies. Our ad people are good about reining them in again.